|
drawings and CAD representations of product
definitions that use the concepts that have changed from the ASME
Y14.5M-1994 standard to the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard.He explains each
rule and symbol change and shows how to apply and interpret the new
Y14.5 practices that will allow dimensioning and tolerancing
professionals to express their design requirements more clearly.
He tells how the changes came to be and shows where they may be applied
for the best results to products. Mr. Meadows relates instances from a
variety of industries where these new concepts might be helpful. He
tells of situations where these “NEW RULES” could have prevented
problems. This two-day training session shows how using the ASME
Y14.5-2009 standard can make product representations more specific in
conveying tolerancing needs, how products can be more easily
manufactured, and how appropriate inspection techniques can be applied.
This ‘NEW RULES’ in
GD&T [per ASME Y14.5-2009] training program and its accompanying
text/workbook were created to highlight and explain in detail the
revised concepts covered in ASME Y14.5-2009 as well as to explain
some of the more difficult and advanced concepts allowed by, but perhaps
not thoroughly explained, in the previous Y14.5 standard. The “NEW
RULES” training program and the 165-page text/workbook are not meant to
replace the a full-length GD&T course using the 574 page textbook by
James D. Meadows entitled
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing - Applications, Analysis &
Measurement [per ASME Y14.5-2009] but, instead, to showcase only
the topics and symbology that have changed from Y14.5M-1994 toY14.5-2009.
GD&T topics other than those specifically shown in the list below can be
addressed on a “refresher” basis, if specifically requested by course
participants.
Topics covered:
New Symbols
A Few Basic Definitions, Formulas & Guidelines
New Rule Regarding the Use of the Symbol
New Terms for Existing Concepts: MMB, LMB and RMB
Derived Median Plane and Derived Medial Line
Actual Mating Envelope
New Alternative Practice regarding the Use of the Angularity
Symbol
New General Rules
Theoretical (Perfect Datum Feature Simulators
‘Perfect Form at MMC is Required for All Rigid Features’
gets a New Exception
Circularity to Control Spherical Diameters
Unilateral or Unequal Symbol
New Symbol for Profile of a Surface All-Over Tolerance Zones
Profile of a Surface All-Over Control Illustration of the
Tolerance Zone Configuration
An Example of a NON-UNIFORM Profile of a Surface Tolerance
Zone
Composite Profile vs. Two Single Segment Profile Controls
An Extension of the Composite Profile of a Surface
Concept—Three Levels of Control
Continuous Feature Symbol of Size
New Datum Features and Datum Feature Categories and What
They Mean
Conical Datum Feature
Curved Surface as a Datum Feature
Datum Feature Patterns
Designating Degrees of Spacial Freedom
Specifying Degrees of Freedom in the Feature Control Frame
Multiple Datum Reference Frame Identification
Specifying the Desired Datum Material Boundary with a Number
Correct Maximum Material Boundary Calculations
Using the Translation Modifier
Using ‘BASIC’ or its Abbreviation ‘BSC’ in a Feature Control
Frame
BSC instead of BASIC
Datum Feature Implied at Regardless of Material Boundary
(RMB)
Datum Features Referenced in Maximum Material Boundary (MMB)
More Examples on Different Part Configurations
Irregular Datum Feature of Size
Repetitive Patterns
New Rules and Symbols for Datum Targets
New Rule for Secondary and Tertiary Datum Features of Size
Positional Boundary Concept
Elongated Holes with Bi-directional Positional Tolerances
Positional Boundary Concept used on Hoses, Pipes and Tubes
D-Shaped Holing using Profile and the Positional Boundary
Concept
Positional Boundary – Amorphous Workpiece and Gage
Composite Positional Tolerancing vs. Two Single Segment
Positional Tolerancing
Composite Tolerancing with Three Levels of Control
Projected Tolerance Zone (A Change or Not a Change?) |
|